{"id":3206,"date":"2018-12-28T10:42:13","date_gmt":"2018-12-28T10:42:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/cidoc.icom.cust.oxymium.net\/archive\/archives\/2016-milan\/"},"modified":"2025-07-07T11:29:39","modified_gmt":"2025-07-07T11:29:39","slug":"2016-milan","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/icom-documentation.mini.icom.museum\/fr\/archives\/conferences_passees\/2016-milan\/","title":{"rendered":"2016 Milan"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Museums and Cultural Landscapes<\/h2>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

ICOM MILANO PROGRAM<\/h3>\n

2016 CONFERENCE PAPERS<\/p>\n

LIDO working group (Chair: Regine Stein)<\/h3>\n

Gordon McKenna, Implementing LIDO<\/p>\n

Angela Kailus, The Common Catalogue of Data Fields for Prints and Drawings: a Guide to High Quality LIDO Data<\/a><\/p>\n

Julia Katona, Two Case Studies to the Enriched, LIDO-based Description of Objects: the Context of the 19th-Century Ornamental Prints and of the Plaster Casts\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Regine Stein & Angela Kailus, Collaborative Development of LIDO Terminology, Part 1<\/a> & Part 2<\/a><\/p>\n

LIDO Terminology: Discussion and approval of first set of recommendations<\/p>\n

Digital Preservation working group\u00a0(Chair: Susanne Nickel)<\/h3>\n

Semantic Research Environments working group (Chairs:\u00a0Siegfried Krause and Guenther Goertz)<\/h3>\n

Introduction to the WissKI Research Environment.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Archeological Sites working group<\/a> (Chair: Stephen Stead)<\/h3>\n

Archaeological Archive Standard<\/p>\n

Archaeological projects generate records that help users comprehend the results. Some projects, like excavations, are destructive processes and therefore the subsequent archive is the only evidence remaining of the archaeology encountered. It is vital, therefore, that the archive facilitates future research, particularly by those with no direct involvement in the original project. The nature of archaeological archives has changed dramatically since the early 1990s. This has resulted in changing demands on digital and physical access, long-term preservation, standardization of documentation and interoperability for searching across databases and digital publications. A number of excellent national and local standards and detailed guidance on the creation, preparation and deposition of archaeological archives have been produced by large and small organizations. The aim of this standard is to outline the common international requirements.<\/p>\n

Exhibition and Performance documentation working group<\/a> (Chair: Gabriel Moore Bevilacqua)<\/h3>\n

Introducing CIDOC\u2019s working groups and their current projects for newcomers.<\/h3>\n

Susanne Nickel: Digital Preservation<\/a><\/p>\n

George Bruseker: CIDOC CRM and Research Environments: “Research Environments and CRM SIG Presentation for newcomers : Presenting applications and demo, discussing collaborations\u201c<\/a><\/p>\n

Introduction to Documentation Standards (Chair: Jonathan Whitson-Cloud)<\/h3>\n

Kipp, Angela & Shepherd, Rupert \u201cSpreading the word: explaining what Museum Documentation is<\/a> – and why it\u2019s important<\/a>\u201d<\/p>\n

Delmas-Glass, Emmanuelle \u201cInternational Image Interoperability Framework (IIIF) supporting research projects at the Yale Center\u00a0for British Art\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Haffner, Dorothee \u201cA Textile Thesaurus – Merging and Enlarging the Existing Vocabularies\u201d\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

Jones, Michael \u201cMind the gaps: missing connections in museum documentation\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

How to capitalize on museum documentation ? –A workshop aimed at Museum Directors and Documentation Managers Meeting objectives: Highlight innovative ways to make the most of museum documentation.\u00a0Session type: Workshop \/ clinic<\/h3>\n

Chair: Nicholas Crofts, Christian Greco, Director,\u00a0Egyptian Museum of Turin<\/p>\n

Is your documentation an expensive necessity, or a valuable resource? This workshop clinic, aimed at museum directors and documentation managers, provides practical tips, innovative solutions and awe-inspiring insights to help release the full potential of your collections information. Please bring your questions, problems and dilemmas for discussion and analysis by our panel of experts.<\/p>\n

Encyclopaedia of Museum Practice wiki –\u00a0Introducing participants to collaborative work with Encyclopaedia of Museum Practice wiki<\/h3>\n

http:\/\/cidoc-dswg.org\/wiki\/tiki-index.php\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n

MATOS, Alexandre; MOTTA, Renata Vieira \u201cImplementing Standards at Sao Paulo State Secretariat of Culture museums<\/p>\n

MCKENNA, Gordon \u201cEEXCESS – The practical tools for museum professionals\u201d<\/p>\n

CIDOC CRM SIG and Research Environments WG\u00a0(Chair:\u00a0Christian-Emil Ore)<\/h3>\n

Heather Dunn, \u201cUsing CIDOC CRM in \u201c150 Years of Canadian Art\u201d Linked Open Data Demonstration Project\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Paola Ronzino, \u201cDocumenting buildings archaeology with CIDOC CRM. The CRMba extension\u201d<\/p>\n

Carlo Meghini, \u201cUsing the CIDOC CRM to evaluate an ontology on narratives\u201d<\/p>\n

Achille Felicetti, \u201cCRMarchaeo: A CIDOC CRM extension to support archaeological excavations\u201d<\/p>\n

Siegfried Krause: \u201cSelected WissKI Projects at the Germanic National Museum in Nuremberg\u201d<\/a><\/p>\n

Piotr Kuroczynski (presented by G. Goerz): Designing an Appication Ontology for Architectural 3D Reconstruction<\/p>\n

Dominic Oldman:\u00a0ResearchSpace<\/a><\/p>\n

George Bruseker, tentative title: modelling the iconographic discourse (to be confirmed)<\/p>\n

Intangible Heritage (Chair: Manvi Seth)<\/h3>\n

Workshop: An Encyclopaedia of Museum Practice, how to collaborate over language barriers (Chair: Jonathan Whitson-Cloud)<\/h3>\n

Training session: Introduction to Museum Processes WG MPI (Chair Walter Koch)<\/h3>\n

Raising awareness and generating basic knowledge about procedures and processes to be found in the museum domain. Participants should gain basic knowledge about technical requirements used for process implementation in an IT supported environment.<\/p>\n

Introduction to Digital Preservation (Chair:\u00a0Susanne Nickel)<\/h3>\n

Panel: UNESCO \/ PERSIST Guidelines (Chair: Susanne Nickel, Digital Preservation working group<\/p>\n

Rolf K\u00e4llman, Sweden, Digisam \u2013 a secretariat for National coordination of digitisation, digital preservation and digital access to cultural heritage)<\/a><\/p>\n

Clement Oury (ISSN): The UNESCO PERSIST content taks force and the Guidelines for the selection of digital heritage for longterm-preservation<\/a><\/p>\n

Gabriel Gabriel Moore Forell Bevilacqua, Brazil, Departamento de Ci\u00eancia da Informa\u00e7\u00e3o, Instituto de Arte e Comunica\u00e7\u00e3o Social, Universidade Federal Fluminense<\/p>\n

Margret Schild, Germany, Theatre and Film museum Duesseldorf<\/a><\/p>\n

Museum Process Implementation (Chair: Walter Koch)<\/h3>\n

Hefner, Jennifer:\u00a0Condition Reporting in the Digital Era: A Case Study of Articheck’s Applications in Fine Art Collections and Exhibitions<\/p>\n

Uueni, Andres:\u00a0Using modern technology to support museum activities. Case study: Estonians Deported to Siberia: Soviet Red Terror 1940-1960<\/p>\n

International Core Data Standard for Archaeological and Architectural Heritage (Chair Stephen Stead)<\/h3>\n

Pierre Choffe, tentative title: \u201cThe DOREMUS Project\u201d<\/p>\n

INTERNATIONAL CORE DATA STANDARD FOR ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE (CDS) The documentation of buildings, monuments and archaeological sites, plays an essential role in promoting the understanding, conservation, preventive maintenance and preservation of the archaeological and architectural heritage. Within Europe, a wide range of recording methods are employed in the compilation of inventories, often within a national framework. The compilation of these inventories may have occurred for a variety of reasons. However, some of these reasons enjoy a more widespread currency, in particular those relating to the protection of cultural heritage, and to providing some form of public access to the information held. The aims of this document are therefore threefold: \u2022 to facilitate communication between national and international bodies responsible for the recording and protection of the built and buried heritage. \u2022 to assist countries at an early stage in developing record systems for the recording and protection of the built and buried heritage. \u2022 to facilitate research utilising archaeological and architectural core data where this has an international dimension. In the form presented here, the core data standard for archaeological and architectural heritage has retained a close relationship to that prepared for historic buildings by the Council of Europe. This should be advantageous to countries able or wishing to include in one database all information relating to the man-made environment. This standard can moreover also be linked with a working standard prepared by CIDOC for archaeological objects (CIDOC 1992) and with the CIDOC minimum data standard for museum objects (CIDOC 1995) which includes archaeological objects.<\/p>\n

CIDOC General Assembly<\/a><\/h3>\n

1.\u00a0Election results,\u00a0<\/a>presentation of new board members<\/a><\/p>\n

2. Approval of minutes from 2015 AGM in New Delhi *, matters arising, apologies<\/p>\n